^ perhaps the most interesting open=seat House race is taking place in the 4th Plymouth, which covers Marshfield and most of Scituate. Read our endorsement below.
—- —- —-
This column complete our endorsement decisions for the State election that finishes up this coming Tuesday. Some of you have already voted. We hope that even if you have already declared your choices, you will find our recommendations worth reading.
As we stated in our previous endorsement column, for the State Legislature this has been a ‘deserves re-election” occasion. The 2018 legislative session enacted a wide assortment of reforms, most of it unanimously or almost, and these enactments have been signed by Governor Baker. We in Massachusetts have consensus governance, and full credit should go to those who have made it a reality — one almost unique in our politically polarized nation. Generally, therefore, we find it difficult to name a State Representative who should not be endorsed for re-election. That said, there are a few House members whose replacement by a challenger will not disappoint us.
We do not trouble to endorse House members running unopposed, because why ? that said, most of those running unopposed who are known to us count among the House’s most capable, well informed, and hard-working electeds we know. Thank you to all.
We therefore endorse the following House members seeking another term. All have opponents :
5th Barnstable : Randy Hunt (R)
1st Essex : Jim Kelcourse (R)
4th Essex : Bradford Hill (R)
4th Middlesex : Danielle Gregoire (D)
9th Essex : Donald Wong (R)
9th Norfolk : Shawn Dooley (R)
2nd Essex : Lenny Mirra (R)
2nd Middlesex ; Jim Arciero (D)
2nd Plymouth : Susan Gifford (R)
7th Worcester : Paul K. Frost (R)
6th Bristol : Carole Fiola (D)
10th Plymouth : Michelle DuBois (D)
3rd Norfolk : Ronald Mariano (D)
31st Middlesex : Michael A. Day (D)
36th Middlesex : Colleen Garry (D)
1st Barnstable : Tim Whelan (R)
10th Worcester : Brian Murray (D)
2nd Barnstable : Will Crocker (R)
There are several open House seats on offer in this election. We have looked at the various candidates and made our choices. Where we could learn a candidate’s position on Question 3, a “No” was a deal breaker. We might accept a few House incumbents who aren’t “Yes on 3,” but we will not accept newcomers who refuse to support civil rights for all. And now to our open-seat endorsements :
19th Middlesex : David A. Robertson (D)
7th Plymouth : Alison Sullivan (R)
12th Bristol : Norman Orrall (R) Note : Norman Orrall is Treasurer candidate Keiko Orrall’s husband. Keiko held this House seat for four terms. We’ve met Norman and find him a gentle, diligent man who will surely continue Keiko’s work.
12th Plymouth : Joe Truschelli (R)
30th Middlesex : Richard Haggerty (D) His opponent touts a Trump-like agenda.
17th Worcester : David LeBoeuf (D)
4th Plymouth : Patrick Kearney (D) (Marshfield and most of Scituate) A close call here. Republican Ed O’Connell seems a strong candidate whose top priority is infrastructure. There’s also an independent candidate, Nathaniel Powell. A vote for either of the three candidates would be a good one.
14th Essex : Christine Minicucci (D) Her opponent is a “No on 3.” Nuff said.
— — —
We also are endorsing Rachael Rollins (D) for Suffolk County District Attorney. We aren’t happy with Rollins’s overreaching intent to use of “nolle prosequi” powers, but she has, since winning her primary over the established favorite, reached out to many City interest groups that hold a less sweeping view of the District Attorney’s office as an instrument of criminal justice reform. In addition, her independent opponent, Michael Maloney, has failed to persuade many voters, who might be inclined not to vote for Rollins, that his campaign is to be taken seriously. Running a serious, strong campaign seems to us like an essential prerequisite. If you can’t marshal strong and broad voter support, how can you run the executive office you are seeking election to ? We endorse a vote for Rachael Rollins.
— — —
The Ballot Questions :
Question 1 : we’ve written in opposition to this initiative, which seeks to impose, as a matter of state law, complicated hospital staffing regulations that few voters have any expertise to decide. A majority of voters appears to agree that this complex proposal is better handled by collective bargaining or by the legislature. We recommend that you vote NO.
Question 2 : would established a citizens’ commission to recommend ways to overturn the Citizens United Supreme Court decision allowing unlimited corporate money into elections. The intent of this proposal seems good to us, but the Commission, if approved by voters, won’t be able to do much. call this a “feel good:” question, then. Vote “Yes” if you like. we intend to do so ourselves.
Question 3 : In 2016 the legislature enacted, and Governor Baker signed, a civil rights bill assuring transgender people full access to all public accommodations just as everybody else has a right to. A “No” vote here is a vote to repeal those civil rights protections. We can NEVER and will never support denials of civil rights to anyone. Please Vote “YES” on Question 3.
—- Mike Freedberg for the Editors / Here and Sphere