Israel’s War and the New Anti-Semitism

Screenshot

Screenshot

^^ John Fetterman expresses the common sense view. How can anyone in our free world disagree / But some do.

America responded en masse and with devastating effect to the 9/11 attack. All of the major instigators have been dealt with, and most of the ordinaries. Likewise, Israel responded by declaring war upon the Gaza enclave and has prosecuted its war without half-steps. This is what free nations do when attacked by foes, It’s what we did in World war II. You want to start a war ? We get to finish it, in ways you will not be happy about.

On October 7th, a mob of terrorists attacked several kibbutzim in southern Israel as well as a music festival, raping, torturing, mutilating, burning, murdering and kidnapping some 1400 Israeli citizens. Joined by thousands of civilians from the city if Gaza, the mobs wreaked the worst pogrom upon Jews since the World War II Holocaust. It was also the worst attack by Islamic terrorists upon the democratic world since the 9/11 attack upon America in 2001.

There has never been a clearer war of goodv ersus evul, or of just cause, than the war that israel declared upon the rlers of Gaza. No nation would ever allow its citizens to be pogrommed as were the citizens of Israel on October 7th. It speaks highly of Israel’s civic strength that nearly all of its 9 million people heeded the call to mount all out war upon its foe and have continued to serve unabated ever since.

Yet here in the free world, where support for Israel should be universal, as its fight is ours as well, there has been a storm of hate unleashed upon Istrael and upon Jews generally, from a small violent corner of what we call “the political left.” Virulent Jew Hate such as not seen in the free world since the 1930s has been visited upon Jews, Jewish busineses, Jewish hospitals, synagogues, and university campuses. Small groups of “left” anti-semites ahve blocked city streets, railway terminals, bridges, factories, airports and the White House as they attack our entire society in support of our Gazan enemy.

Hiow can this be ? Where did this Jew hate vandalism and outlaw acts arise from ?

I have no comprehensive answer. the acts of mobs can have many origins. But one cause is clear : in universities especially, for decades, students have been taught to hate Israel and to view Jews as evil.

The reason is this : a theory has come to be, that the world is divided into oppressors and oppressed, and that oppressors are white, the oppressed brown or black. Therein, the white oppressors “colonized”’ areas where the brown and black oppressed live. Colonizing is, of course, a bad thing, says the theory, not aware, I guess, that every human society that ever was has “colonized” the places into which humans have moved.

I do not intend here to refute the ignorance of the “colonizers are bad” assertion. That’s a topic for another day. Nor do I intend to debunk the lie that Jews in Israel are “colonizers’; who have “stolen land” from the “indigenous” Palestinians. In fact, no one is indigenous to anywhere. All of our ancestors, at all times in human history, have come from somewhere else.

How this theory of justice arose, by which the nexus of reward and punishment is decided strictly by skin color, I have no idea. But it did arise. It appears to have taken over the curriculum of social studies in many of our universities and some of our schools. How did it not be vigorously opposed ? How did university faculties — and administrators — who supposedly oversee enlightenment and the guarantees of freedom that our society has committed to — not sweep this racist theory away at the outset, much less embrace it ? And how did they ever allow Jews — the most constantly persecuted people in the Western world — to become the number one target of the propagators of this race theory ?

You can answer these questions as well as I. Obviously the teachers and administrators agreed with the theory. That everything is a matter of skin color, and that as Jews are white, they are evil too. Ans maybe the primary evil, because, as the race theorists constantly tell it, Jews run everything ; the media, entertainemnt, finance, the arts, eduaction, medicine, the courts. Thus, say the race theorists, the first step toward justice is to eliminate the Jews.

And of course the state of israel is exhibit A in the race theorists’ attack upon Jews. Not only is Israel the most successful Jswisbh vengture since ancient times, but it has taken effect in lands occupied in part by people we now call “Palestinians,” many of whom were displaced by the wars in which Jews established the indepoendnece of an Israeli state. Even worse, in the race theorists’ view, many of the Jews who fought the enemies of Israel independence came from white Europe. that hey came as refugees fleeing the Holocaust made no difference to the race theorists ebcause to the Palestininians already in the land, they came as immnigrants, a flood of newcomers.

This the Jewish refugees did. They were in fact newcomers to what becanme indepodnent Israel. Inconviently, however, to the race theorist, far more ewish refugees came from the Middle Eat itself and North Africa and were not white at all. But they too did co me, and they displaced or irrotated yet more Palestinians.

Thus the establishment of Israel and ts development provided the race theorists with an ongoing fact, and Israel’s many succeses in wars waged against it by neighboring counties and several wvaes of terrorists have infuriated the race theorists gto the boiling point.

Thjus the violent Jew hate response to the pogrom on October 7th — a burst of frustration by folks who for 40 years had had to watch israel grow and triumph and triumph and grow, against all odds and comers, wthiout being able to do or say anythjng about it.

No wonder wde see this level of villent, nazi-like Jew hate from the believers of race theory. For the Gazan terrorists who raped, tortured, murdered, burned, and kidnapped 1400 Israelis did what they, the race theorists, wished they could do.

I pull no punches here .

The violent street mobs of Jew haters wish they could pogrom every Jew in the world. The loudest of them say so, out loud and in public.

Yet the race theorists have, I nk, vastly overplayed their hand. They have alienated everybiody else, and, in the Congressional hearings dominated by Congresswoman Stefanik, three university presidents amde clear that talking the genocide of Jews did not violate their campus policies. This shocked the nation, as it should have. two of the university presidents have since resigned, and universities generally are now under several lines of attack upon the dominant position that race theorists occupy in their faculties and administraion.

Clearkly the heyday of race is everything are over, thank goodness.

But the clearest evidence that the Jew hate mobs have overplayed comes from two battlefields. In the one, of war, Israel is defeating the Gazan foe engtirely, permanen tly. On the other, political, field, the loudest, most extreme Congressional haters of Israel and Jews generally are likely to lose their sats in the Democratic primaris upcoming.

I think the entire apparatus of “progressivism” has peaked. Everywhere in cities whdere progressives had taken over diring 2018-2021, they are losing re-election to moderate-mindded challengers. Voters see that the progressives’ reckless experients contradict common sense, not gto mention the live and ,let live arrangements that most act ual poeople make with their neighbors. the natkion as a whle is moving sharply away from rabid visions — from what we call “the left” — and may well itself overreach as it erases the race theorists’ excesses. Can we find the reasonable middle in time to not lose our national blance entirely ? I pray so.

— Mike Freedberg / Here and Sphere

ALIVE, BUT ALSO DEAD : TODAY’S GOP


Image

^ Chris Christie : a Fiorello LaGuardia for the 21st Century ?

—- —- —-

Folks in today’s GOP think it’s very much alive, indeed is the wave of the future. Observers OUTSIDE the GOP think it’s very much dead, the voice of the past, grim and gone.

They’re both right. Here’s why.

A political party is its people, its rank and file and its big voices. Today’s GOP has major big voices that span almost the entire horizon of American governance :

—- There is Chris Christie, voice of the Northeast, populist, even progressive, Fiorello LaGuardia wing of the GOP, to which this writer belongs (Christie even looks and speaks like LaGuardia).

—- There’s Jeb Bush, son and brother of Presidents, voice of the expansionist, immigrant-welcoming vision of growth and opportunity — a Teddy Roosevelt without T.R.’s Anglo-Saxon bias.

Image

^ Jeb bush : welcoming immigrants as a boon to our economy and the rescue of Social security

—- In the Senate, there’s Rand Paul (KY), voice of “libertarian” agendas, with one foot in the camp of radical freedom / isolation, and his other in nativism and gun-brandishing kookery

Image

^ Rand Paul : most influential libertarian voice in decades

—- also in the Senate, there’s John McCain : internationalist, reformer — including progressive banking and campaign finance reform — top voice of our war veterans and the avatar of bi-partisan agreements, with his two most effective allies, Lindsey Graham (SC) and Bob Corker (TN).

Image

^ Tennessee’s Bob Corker : shrewd and willing to experiment

—- add yet another Senator, Marco Rubio (FL), who is trying to be all things to all people: a plan that rarely works but which at least acknowledges that all people are entitled to be listened to and responded to

—- and the Tea Party, anti-government to the max, and “Christian” social conservatives, strong in the South and Mississippi valley: think Rick Santorum, Mike Huckabee, Rick Perry, and a bunch of other guv’nors and legislators whose names we seldom hear up Nawth but who are wreaking Armageddon on the social progress of numerous states.

Image

^ Tea Party ; frustration is a dead end politics

Life, there most definitely is, on the GOP side. Unfortunately, there is also death there. The GOP rank and file includes almost no people of color, few who live alternative lifestyles, and not very many Hispanics. Walk through any important American city — state capitols especially — and you will see everybody that the GOP is not. The GOP holds sway in America’s back country, including the most outlying exurbs of big cities — people — almost all White — who see themselves losing ground, economically and culturally, to city people. This is not a misperception. They are losing ground. And the people to whom they are losing ground — the highly educated, the technology whizzes — today live, work, and shop in center cities and have remarkably remade almost all of these.

The GOP is, to a large degree, the party of America’s have-nots and excludeds. Few GOP’ers belong to the underclass or the working poor, but of those whose incomes rank just above the minimum — who work at tasks increasingly unrewarded by the technology economy — the GOP claims a majority. Curiously, the same is true of their bosses. The executives of technology companies overwhelmingly support the Democrats, but the folks who own and manage enterprises staffed by slightly above minimum-wage workers identify just as GOP as their workers do. As for minimum wage enterprises, the more minimum the wages paid to its workers, the more GOP does the management of such companies identify.

Image

^ Chick-a-fil CEO : fast food GOP

This is, economically, a culture of death. No one wants to live as a minimum wage employee subject to termination at any moment, without health insurance or benefits of any kind. No business that engages workers on that basis can ever rest easy that it will not be undercut by a competitor yet more ruthless. Workers in this sort of economy cannot participate in it. They can barely pay the essentials — indeed often require food stamps and other public assistance just to get by. A just-get-by family cannot buy anything discretionary ; and it is the discretionary economy that grows itself, that increases the nation’s prosperity and builds us a future.

This death would not be so dead if it embraced people of color, immigrants, and those of alternative lifestyle living and working in similar conditions. But it does not embrace them. It sees them as the cause of the death culture that has come upon them. Thus to death is added isolation, a kind of cultural solitary confinement.

The GOP needs badly to shake itself free of this culture of death; to deconstruct it entirely and rebuild entirely anew the lives of those now trapped in it. So far, however, the party’s only answer to this death trip is that of Texas’s Ted Cruz and Wisconsin’s Paul Ryan: an “opportunity fantasy.” As Congressman Jim McDermott (D-WA) just recently, in committee hearing, pointed out, this fantasy isn’t real. In it, everybody is on his own — no social safety net of any kind because that breeds laziness, say Cruz and Ryan — pursuing a kind of multi-level marketing scheme in which, if you dream hard enough, you will pyramid your dreams into acres of diamonds. This might work for a lucky, early few; for the future-less millions of us, it’s just another brick in the wall of being lied to.

Image

^ Ted Cruz : a male Mary Kay Ash ?

It is hard to be alive when much of you is dead. The GOP has plenty of life in it, at the leader level. Whether those leaders will have more alive followers than they have now depends on their ability to cast off the deadness. By 2016 we will know if any of them has succeeded.

—- Michael Freedberg / Here and Sphere

Image^

^ NYC Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia ; when the GOP was the voice of big multitudinous cities

PRESIDENT, 2016 ; EARLY POLLS ALL FAVOR CLINTON and CHRISTIE

Image

^ Hillary Clinton : beats all opponents

McClatchy Newspapers and Marist have just published a full poll of the Presidential race. It shows that Hillary Clinton beats all challengers, most by double digits:

Clinton v. Chris Christie : Clinton 47 Christie 41
Clinton v. Jeb Bush : Clinton 48, Bush 40
Clinton v. Marco Rubio : Clinton 50, Rubio 38
Clinton v. Rand Paul ; Clinton 50, Rand Paul 38
Clinton v. Paul Ryan : Clinton 53, Ryan 37
Clinton v. Rick Perry ; Clinton 52, Perry 36.

as for the Dem primary, it’s Clinton 63, Biden 13, Cuomo 6.

This poll mirrors those already released by Quinnipiac University and Public Policy polling (PPP). Those polls show Clinton carrying Virginia against all comers and doing the same in iowa and Ohio except against Chris Christie, who ties her in those two states. Clearly, Hillary Clinton right now is the clear favorite to become our next President — If she runs.

Moreover, her huge numbers over Vice President Joe Biden, in the Democratic Primary, make clear that voters do NOT see Hillary as a continuation of the Obama Presidency. Indeed, it appears that they see Hillary as the opposite of him. this is bad news for those GOP pundits who want to assert that after eight years of Obama, it is time for a change. Hillary Clinton IS that change — at least she is how voters see it.

Image
^ Chris Christie : competitive against Clinton and favored by GOP voters

We have also been opining that the above results guaranteed that neither Christie nor Jeb Bush will get the GOP nomination. After all, they run competitively. And to the GOP base, being competitive with a Democrat means compromising with the unthinkable. But the McClatchy/Marist poll of Republican Primary voters indicates that we were wrong. It looks now as though we were wrong. Tea Party loudmouths, fake God preachers, and Tea-district Congressmen may view compromise with Democrats as anathema, but GOP Primary voters appear to favor Chris Christie, whose career has symbolized GOP-Democrat co-operation and mutual respect.

Here is the McClatchy/Marist GOP primary result :

Christie 15
Ryan 13
Rubio 12
Paul 9
Bush 9
Cruz 7

To the GOP loudmouths and haters, Christie is “dead to me.” that is how they talk of him. But to the GOP’s voters, Christie is more alive than any of the other hopefuls, several of whom look rather much like “dead.”

Maybe Chris Christie can do it — win the 2016 GOP nomination. If so, the GOP will be at least useful again to most people — an instrument of policy, not venom.

— Michael Freedberg / Here and Sphere